City Life

I know of no author who can portray today’s big city life more masterfully than Don DeLillo. His words are accurate and loaded with the emotion that city living evokes. The insights he shares didn’t come his way by  majoring in urban studies at some distant university; he got them by pounding the pavement in his native Bronx and the rest of New York City (NYC) before fame ever found him.


In his latest novel, Zero K, he offers a glimpse of modern city life and especially homelessness:

Languages, sirens all the time, beggar in a bundled mass, man, or woman, hard to tell even when I approach and drop a dollar in the dented plastic cup. Two blocks farther on I tell myself that I should have said something, and then I change the subject before it gets too complicated.

«Before it gets too complicated.» These words still give me goosebumps every time I read them. It’s what we have to do in the cities. Find a way to live with the complexities of languages, cultures, religions, mental states and economic disparities. And you have to embrace it too or it will defeat you.

According to U.S. Census data, a total of 192 different languages are spoken in NYC homes, while 156 are spoken in Chicago. And languages reflect cultures; those who speak different languages also have different customs, traditions, moral codes and holidays. At first glance these numbers seem to be cool statistics, but how do you run a city with them? How do you prepare schools and teachers? First responders? Libraries?

Now, despite their relatively harsh winters, both  NYC and Chicago have homeless populations numbering in the tens of thousands. Everyone agrees there is a problem, but agreement on what exactly is the problem is another story. A solution, if their is one, depends on defining the problem(s), identifying the various causes and the level of empathy and tolerance on the part of the overall population when it come to taking actions. Whew!

Chicago Homeless Camp via Chicago Sun Times

I suggest you read the DeLillo quote again. We all feel it to some degree when encountering  a homeless person. Am I being conned? Should I give? If I do, how much? Is he or she drunk? If so, do I help out or not? What about the next person and the next? Should I offer something more —something that may take my time as well as my money? Should I have said something too instead of avoiding eye contact? Is this person critically ill? Should I call an ambulance? . . .

About all any one person can do is change the subject before it gets too complicated.  That and keep the resolve to stay in the city and stay engaged.

8 comentarios en “City Life

  1. I don’t agonize over at least one of those decisions. I ALWAYS say something, *especially* if I can drop nothing in a cup. If I have a bit to spare, I share, usually saying, «I’m sorry things are rough for you. I wish it could be more, but I hope this helps a little.» RIGHT in the eyes, btw. That’s not very complicated.

    Affirming the human being status of someone going through tough times is the least we owe each other, it seems to me. If our elected officials would do this, perhaps they’d actually SEE the extent of the problem and actually DO something to reduce the number of people who «live rough.»

    Will we get scammed sometimes? I dunno’ – I’m not sure that reaching out to help another living spirit ever falls in that category.
    (Madelyn Griffith-Haynie – ADDandSoMuchMORE dot com)
    ADD Coach Training Field founder; ADD Coaching co-founder
    «It takes a village to transform a world!»

    Le gusta a 2 personas

Deja una respuesta

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Salir /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Salir /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Salir /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s